Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27398 WP No. 16809 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
WRIT PETITION NO. 16809 OF 2026 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
S B MUNEGOWDA S/O LATE BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT SEEKAYANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU - 562 110.
REPRESENTED BY ONE OF THE G.P.A HOLDER G.K.SUMAN S/O KONAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO.18, JAKKUR PLANTATION JAKKUR, BENGALURU - 560 064. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANATH KUMAR SHETTY K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 110.
2.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU 560 110.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27398 WP No. 16809 of 2026
3.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU - 560 001.
4.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P.RADHA AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS COMMANDING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER TO R1 ON 20.06.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND THEREAFTER MAKE NECESSARY CHANGE OF ENTRIES INCLUDING THE RTC IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF 07 GUNTAS OF LAND IN SY.NO.178 SITUATED AT VISHWANATHAPURA VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK AND ALSO ISSUE KHATA IN RESPECT OF THE SAID LAND IN SO FAR AS THIS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27398 WP No. 16809 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER
The learned AGA accepts notice for respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner, in this petition, is to consider the representation produced at Annexure-F to the writ petition, which has not been done till date.
3. Having taken note of the averments made in the aforementioned representation, it is stated that the land in question has been granted in favour of the petitioner. However, khatha has not been made in favour of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner herein, after verifying the original records to ascertain whether the land has been granted in favour of the petitioner or not. Thereafter, Respondent No.1 is
directed to take decision in the matter within four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27398 WP No. 16809 of 2026
4. With this observation, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41