2026:JHHC:21343 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3927 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3927 of 2026 ---- 1.Uday Ram, aged about 46 years, S/o Prawesh Ram 2.Dipak Ram @ Deepak Ram, aged about 26 years, S/o Pradip Ram 3.Nitish Kumar, aged about 22 years, S/o Ganesh Ram 4.Harendra Kumar, aged about 26 years, S/o Sihari Ram @ Dharmendra Ram @ Sidhari Ram 5.Vishal Kumar, aged about 21 years, S/o Anuj Ram 6.Sanoj Kumar @ Sanoj Ram, aged about 27 years, S/o Yamuna Ram 7.Pravesh Ram @ Ram Pravesh Ram, aged about 56 years, S/o Late Laltu Ram 8.Kamlesh Ram, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Laltu Ram @ Muneshwar Ram, All are residents of village – Shreepalpur, PO and PS – Pipra, District – Palamu, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Amrita Kumari, Advocate ---- 02/20.07.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.96 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.815 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 143, 323, 325, 341 and 504 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Palamu. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the 2026:JHHC:21343 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3927 of 2026 petitioners were earlier granted regular bail on surrender during investigation. He further submits that now the charge-sheet has been submitted and cognizance has been taken under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code and now the petitioners have received summon. He then submits that the correct procedure will be to appear before the learned Court. He next submits that he may kindly be allowed to appear before the learned Court and remain on bail as he has already been granted bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioners have unnecessarily filed the anticipatory bail in spite of appearing before the learned Court. 5. The petitioners have already been granted regular bail on surrender and thereafter under Section 307 of Indian Penal Code cognizance has been taken and the correct procedure should be that the petitioners are required to appear before that Court. 6. In view of the above, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from the date of this order and he will furnish undertaking that he will cooperate with the trial of the case and will appear as and when his appearance is required by the learned Court and the learned Court shall allow the petitioners to remain on bail as granted earlier. 7. This application is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 20.07.2026 Sangam/