Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2077 (JHR)

SUNNY SHARMA ALLIAS SUNNY KUMAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./14/2026 · 2026-02-20

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 14 of 2026 ----- 1. Sunny Sharma @ Sunny Kumar Sharma, S/o Satendar Sharma 2. Vicky Sharma @ Vickey Sharma, S/o Satendar Sharma, Both are R/o F. No. D-2/4, Green Park, L.I.G. Apartment, Anilsurpath, P.O. & P.S. Kadma, Town-Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand … …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Vishal Kr. Trivedi, Advocate Mr. Jai Mohan Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. ----- Oral Order 03 / Dated : 20.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners named above have been made accused in connection with Kadma P.S. Case No. 18 of 2023 (S.T. No. 268 of 2023, G.R. No. 682 of 2023) for the offence registered under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Jamshedpur. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected on merit and now the case is posted for defence evidence. Under the circumstance, I do not find any change of circumstance for renewing his prayer for bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected again. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra Uploaded 20.02.2026