APHC010232112024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11659/2024 Between: 1. VELPURU MUDDU KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O. V.LOKNATH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, MALE, MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 524121. 2. VELPURU GANAPATHI REDDY,, S/O. V.RAMADHASU REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, MALE, MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 524121. 3. VELPURU MAHESWARA REDDY,, S/O. V. RAMADHASU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, MALE MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 524121. 4. CHATTU GOPINATH REDDY,, S/O. CH.GANGARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, MALE, MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURUPETA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 524121. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SULLURUPETA POLICE STATION, SULLURUPETA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, SULLURUPETA POLICE STATION, SULLURUPETA. TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. GADI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. SRINIVASULU REDDY, MALE, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. MANGA NELLORE VILLAGE AND POST, SULLURPET MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may 2 be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in interfering into civil disputes and threatening to dispossess the Petitioners from their Landed Properties i.e., an extent of Ac.0.82 cents in R.S.no.15-2, an extent of Ac.0.35 cents in Sy.No.177-13, an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2. an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.99-1 and an extent of Ac.1.05 cents in Sy.No.68-4, and an extent of Ac.0.69 cents belongs to 1st petitioner an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2 belongs to 2nd petitioner, an extent of Ac.0.76 cents belongs to 3rd petitioner and an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.63-6, an extent of Ac. 0.01 cents in Sy.No.100-5 and an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.175-13A belongs to the 4th petitioner situated at Manga Nellore Village, Sullurupeta Mandal,Tirupati District, under the guise of 5th respondent with an injunction order in O.S.No.43 of 2016 on the file of VII Additional District judge, Gudur, inspite of the petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of the properties as illegal irregular, arbitrary violative of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners from their respective lands i.e., an extent of Ac.0.82 cents in R.S.no.15-2, an extent of Ac.0.35 cents in Sy.No.177-13, an extent of Ac. 1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2, an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.99-1 and an extent of Ac.1.05 cents in Sy.No.68-4, and an extent of Ac.0.69 cents belongs to 1st petitioner an extent of Ac.1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2 belongs to 2nd petitioner an extent of Ac.0.76 cents belongs to 3rd petitioner and an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.63-6, an extent of Ac. 0.01 cents in Sy.No.100-5 and an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.175-13A belongs to the 4th petitioner situated at Manga Nellore Village, Sullurupeta Mandal, Tirupati District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N ANULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. Y MAHA LAKSHMI 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in interfering into civil disputes and threatening to dispossess the Petitioners from their Landed Properties i.e., an extent of Ac.0.82 cents in R.S.No.15-2, an extent of Ac.0.35 cents in Sy.No.177-13, an extent of Ac.1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2. an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.99-1 and an extent of Ac.1.05 cents in Sy.No.68-4, and an extent of Ac.0.69 cents belongs to 1st Petitioner an extent of Ac.1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2 belongs to 2nd petitioner, an extent of Ac.0.76 cents belongs to 3rd petitioner and an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.63-6, an extent of Ac. 0.01 cents in Sy.No.100-5 and an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.175-13A belongs to the 4th petitioner situated at Manga Nellore Village, Sullurupeta Mandal,Tirupati District, under the guise of 5th respondent with an injunction order in O.S.No.43 of 2016 on the file of VII Additional District judge, Gudur, in spite of the petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of the properties as illegal irregular, arbitrary violative of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and also offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th Respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners from their respective lands i.e., an extent of Ac.0.82 cents in R.S.no.15-2, an extent of Ac.0.35 cents in Sy.No.177-13, an extent of Ac.1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2, an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.99-1 and an extent of Ac.1.05 cents in Sy.No.68-4, and an extent of Ac.0.69 cents belongs to 1st petitioner an extent of Ac.1.19 cents in Sy.No.99-2 belongs to 2nd petitioner an extent of Ac.0.76 cents belongs to 3rd petitioner and an extent of Ac.0.79 cents in Sy.No.63-6, an extent of Ac.0.01 cents in Sy.No.100-5 and an extent of Ac.0.05 cents in Sy.No.175-13A belongs to the 4th petitioner situated at Manga Nellore Village, Sullurupeta Mandal, Tirupati District and pass ...= Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned counsel for unofficial respondents and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that there are civil disputes between the Petitioners and the unofficial respondents. No crime has been registered against the Petitioners. Respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 4 Learned counsel for unofficial respondents would submit that the suit filed by the unofficial respondents is decreed in favour of the unofficial respondents and would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders by disposing of this writ petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 11659 of 2024 07.01.2026 Mjl /*