Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20763 (JHR)

ABHISHEK SINGH @ ABHISHEK KUMAR SINGH @ PANDIT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5077/2026 · 2026-07-18

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5077 of 2026 ---- Abhishek Singh @ Abhishek Kumar Singh @ Pandit, aged about 28 years, S/o – Manoj Kumar Singh, resident of Vill – Kushaha, P.O.-Gulni, P.S.-Shambhuganj, Dist.-Banka, Bihar. …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Bhaswat Prakash, Adv. For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P. ---- 03/Dated: 18th July, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant who is in custody since 05.11.2024 has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Bishtupur P.S. Case No.264 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 125, 324(4) & 109 of B.N.S., Sections 27/35 of the Arms Act, and further Section 111(3) of B.N.S. has been added vide order dated 05.11.2024 corresponding to G.R. No.1143 of 2024 and subsequently S.T. Case No.156 of 2025, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Jamshedpur. 3. Earlier the prayer for grant of regular bail was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 12.03.2026 passed in B.A. No.1716 of 2026. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the FIR is against unknown and till date even charge has not been framed. Further, two co-accused namely Prabhash Singh @ Nunu Singh @ Prabash Singh in B.A. No.10531 of 2024 and Aman Raj @ Golu @ Aman Singh in B.A. No.6681 of 2025 have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Benches. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on 2026:JHHC:21227 Page | 2 B.A. No.5077 of 2026 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Jamshedpur in connection with Bishtupur P.S. Case No.264 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No.1143 of 2024 (S.T. Case No.156 of 2025), subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the trial court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 18th July, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 21.07.2026