[2026:RJ-JP:2171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1106/2025 1. AMBF Samiridhi Nidhi Limited, Having Its Registered Office At E-7 Central City Market, Gill Colony, Padampur, Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335041 through Director Shri Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Lal Aged About 48 Years. Having Corporate Identity Number- (CIN) U64990RJ2023PLN091269. 2. Vijay Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 48 Years, Director of Ambf Samiridhi Nidhi Limited, having its Registered Office At E-7 Central City Market, Gill Colony, Padampur, Ganganagar, Rajasthan-335041. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, 5th Floor, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi-110001. 2. Deputy Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, 5th Floor, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi- 110001. 3. Registrar of Companies, G/6-7, Second Floor, Residency Area, Civil Lines, Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Chaturvedi, Sr. CGPC with Ms. Nandini Chaturvedi & Ms. Rakshita Chaturvedi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 19/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "The humble petitioner pray that the petition may kindly be al- lowed and by an appropriate order, writ or direction Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to: i) Quash and set aside the act taken by the respondent No.2 in respect of Rejection of application vide SRN AA6942145 dated 04.03.2024 and/or set aside all the consequences thereof due to the rejection the aforementioned application (NDH-4); ii) The respondent No.2 may kindly pass a speaking order in the light of the provisions after giving proper hearing to the petitioner; iii) The respondents may kindly be directed to consider the Application vide SRN AA6942145 dated 04.03.2024 in Form NDH-4 as deemed approved and/or allowed as per Nidhi (amendment) Rules, 2022; iv) Any other directions which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit may also be passed in favor of the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if: the [2026:RJ-JP:2171] (2 of 2) [CW-1106/2025] petitioners are permitted to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.2-Deputy Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs encapsulating the grievance(s) raised in the present writ petition; and if a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time bound manner. 3. Heard. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before respondent No.2 within a period of two (2) weeks from today. The respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with the law after providing a personal hearing to the petitioner. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-16