Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20754 (RAJ)

GIRRAJ MEENA S/O SARWAN MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19916/2025 · 2026-02-04

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5254] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19916/2025 Girraj Meena S/o Sarwan Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Kundla, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. District Collector, Alwar 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Rajgarh District Alwar 4. Tehsildar, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar 5. Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Rajgarh District Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 04/02/2026 In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 01.09.2025, issued by the respondents under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956. Undisputedly, the petitioner has not filed reply to the said notice and has directly approached this Court and hence, this Court is not inclined to delve into the merits of the matter. Considering the remedy available to the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is required to approach the concerned respondent(s) by filing reply to the notice dated 01.09.2025 along with any other document which he wishes to file [2026:RJ-JP:5254] (2 of 2) [CW-19916/2025] in support of his reply. It is directed that in case, any such reply/representation along with document is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one week from today, the concerned respondent will consider the same and pass a reasoned and speaking order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of three weeks thereafter, strictly in accordance with law. Considering the facts of the present case, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner till a reasoned and speaking order, as directed above is passed by the respondents, with respect to his residential house. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /24