Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20750 (AP)

PULIGEDDA ANJANEYULU, E.G. DIST v. CHAIRMAN & M.D., APEPDCL., VISAKHAPATNAM & 4 OT

WP/16198/2017 · 2026-03-30

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010243042017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16198/2017 Between: 1. PULIGEDDA ANJANEYULU, E.G. DIST, PULIGEDDA ANJANEYULU, S/O. LATE SRI SURYA RAO, HINDU, AGE 62 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. SEELA VILLAGE, KAJULURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAIRMAN M D APEPDCL VISAKHAPATNAM 4 OT, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, P&T COLONY, SEETHAMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 013. 2. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LIMITED, REP. BY ITS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (OPERATION), RAJAHMUNDRY - 533 101, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA - 533 005 E.G. DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATION, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, ARYAVATAM - 533 468, E.G. DISTRICT. 5. GUNTAMUKKALA VEER RAJU, S/O. LATE SRI PATTABIRAMAYYA, RIO. D.NO.2-56, MAIN ROAD, SEELA - 533 468, KAJULURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in giving power supply to the service connection bearing SC.No.14514722 32000672 of the 5th respondent at unauthorized premises as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and contrary to the General Terms And Conditions (GTC) of the 1st respondent and consequently direct the Respondents to take appropriate action as per law with regard to the said service connection of the 5th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 19911 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to take action on the representation submitted by the petitioner on 23-03-2017 in respect of the unauthorized use of service connection bearing SC.No.1451472232000672 of the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K ARVIND KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)-25927/ap/909/2009 3. A K KISHORE REDDY 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16198 of 2017 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent events, cause in the present lis does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 31.03.2026 PSA