ANUJ TIWARI S/O RAVINDRA TIWARI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/660/2026 · 2026-04-01
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2075 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2075 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:13520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 660/2026 Anuj Tiwari S/o Ravindra Tiwari, Aged 19 Years, R/o House No. 625, Mahaveer Enclave Part -2, Dabri Moad, Police Station Dabri, New Delhi. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Nayak Ms. Anuradha Nayak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 01/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 491/2025 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (west) for the offences under Sections 178, 179, 180, 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case solely on the information of co-accused and no incriminating material was recovered from the present petitioner. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned court, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
[2026:RJ-JP:13520] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-660/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that recovery of counterfeit notes and machines were effected from the other co-accused and apart from the disclosure statement of co-accused there is no incriminating material qua the petitioner, therefore considering the aforesaid facts and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Anuj Tiwari S/o Ravindra Tiwari, in connection with FIR No. 491/2025 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot, District Jaipur (west)shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /25