[2026:RJ-JP:982] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16705/2025 Ramprasad S/o Dhanna, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhasu, Police Station Todaraisingh, District Tonk, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.P. Dadhich Mr. Dikshant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/01/2026 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Ramprasad S/o Dhanna seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.29/2025 dated 20.01.2025 registered at P.S. Nasirabad Sadar District - Ajmer, for the offence under Sections 305(A) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. [2026:RJ-JP:982] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-16705/2025] 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that first bail application was dismissed by this Hon’ble Court on 04.09.2025 and till date 5 witnesses were examined by the prosecution. He further submitted that the important witnesses PW-2 and PW-3 have not supported the case of prosecution rather their evidence is not sufficient to draw a conclusion about involvement of present petitioner. He also referred evidence of PW-1 and submitted that even the complainant PW-1 has not named anyone. He further submitted that co-accused Vishnu was released by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nasirabad on 24.06.2025 and present petitioner is in custody since his arrest in the instant case. He further submitted that present petitioner is on bail in other matters as referred by the police. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station wherein three cases were registered against the petitioner. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. The first bail application of petitioner was dismissed on 04.09.2025 wherein we found that petitioner was indulged in house breaking and burglary in temple. The police has filed a charge-sheet against three accused Suraj, Vishnu and Ram Prasad. Co-acused Vishnu was granted bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge on 24.06.2025. As per order of [2026:RJ-JP:982] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-16705/2025] the trial court, 5 criminal cases were registered against the petitioner. The accused Suraj is habitual offender and several cases were registered against him. We have considered the evidence recorded so far including as referred by learned counsel for petitioner. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Ramprasad S/o Dhanna, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. [2026:RJ-JP:982] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-16705/2025] (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /24