Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20749 (JHR)

MD. SABAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3934/2026 · 2026-07-20

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21381 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3934 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3934 of 2026 ---- Md. Sabat, aged about 30 years, son of Md. Rustam Ali, resident of village – Badhakol, Basantroy, Godda, PO and PS – Godda, District - Godda .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Anuj Burman, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Advocate ---- 02/20.07.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Basantrai P.S. Case No.40 of 2023 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 364, 506, 302 and 120-B/34 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Godda. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner has nothing to do with abduction and murder of the husband of the informant. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be granted anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that serious allegations are there of abduction and murder and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 2026:JHHC:21381 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3934 of 2026 5. Considering that the allegations are there of abduction and murder of husband of the informant and in view of that, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 20.07.2026 Sangam/