APHC010242062024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11943/2024 Between: 1. PULIVARTHI VENKATA MANI PRASAD @ NANI,, S/O. PULIVARTHI NAGARAJU NAIDU, AGE 52, OCC. TELUGU DESAM PARTY IN- CHARGE, CHANDRAGIRI ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, R/O. PLOT NO. 38, GAJALAKSHMI NAGAR, OPP. RAMANAIDU KALYAMANDAPAM, TANAPALLI ROAD, TIRUPATHI TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. K. GANA SUDHA @ SUDHA REDDY,, W/O. PULIVARTHI VENKATA MANI PRASAD @ NANI, AGE 50, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. PLOT NO. 38, GAJALAKSHMI NAGAR, OPP. RAMANAIDU KALYAMANDAPAM, TANAPALLI ROAD, TIRUPATHI TOWN AND DISTRICT. 3. PULIVARTHI VINEEL SAI VARDHAN REDDY,, S/O. PULIVARTHI VENKATA MANI PRASAD @ NANI, AGE 29 R/O. PLOT NO. 38, GAJALAKSHMI NAGAR, OPP. RAMANAIDU KALYAMANDAPAM, TANAPALLI ROAD, TIRUPATHI TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. Dr.VJP,J W.P No.11943 of 2024 2 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, COLLECTORS OFFICE, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE LEVEL SECURITY REVIEW COMMITTEE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, REP. BY CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, NIRVACHAN SADAN, ASHOKA RD, PANDIT PANT MARG AREA, SANSAD MARG AREA, NEW DELHI, DELHI - 110001. 7. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER, ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P. SECRETARIAT, 4TH BLOCK, ROOM NO. 101, GROUND FLOOR, PENUMAKA, AMARAVATI RD., VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI - 522503. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not providing 3 plus 3 armed security cover individually to each of the petitioners 1 to 3 by considering the representations dated 14-05-2024, as the same is contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, malafide and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to provide 3 plus 3 armed security cover individually to the petitioners forthwith by considering the representations dated 14-05-2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to provide 3+3 armed security cover individually to each of the petitioners 1 to 3 forthwith by considering the representations dated 14-05-2024, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and to pass Dr.VJP,J W.P No.11943 of 2024 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME Dr.VJP,J W.P No.11943 of 2024 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11943/2024 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue a Writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not providing 3 + 3 armed security cover individually to each of the petitioners 1 to 3 by considering the representations dated 14- 05-2024, as the same is contrary to law, illegal, arbitrary, malafide and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to provide 3 + 3 armed security cover individually to the petitioners forthwith by considering the representations dated 14-05-2024 and to pass such other and further orders.= 2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:03.03.2026 Ksj