Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20747 (JHR)

RAKESH AHIR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6706/2026 · 2026-07-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21387] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6706 of 2026 ------ Rakesh Ahir aged about 25 Years, S/O Dhananjay Ahir R/O Village- Tau, P.O. & P.S.- Bundu, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-20-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bundu P.S. Case No.18 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111 (2) (b), 111 (6), 112 (2), 317 (4), 317 (5), 338, 336 (3), 318 (4) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in selling of stolen motorcycle and from the house of the petitioner, three stolen motorcycles have been recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.07.2026 passed in B.A. No.6293 of 2026. It is further submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.02.2026 as has been mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-VI, Ranchi in connection with Bundu P.S. Case No.18 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-20.07.2026-Animesh/