CRWP No.5981
IN TH 158 Kiran Bala State of Pun CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. By w Constitution official resp respondent N 2. Notic 3. On th accepts noti 4. As pe wishes of members/re 5. Both upon their A Kiran Bala 5981 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** Bala and another v. Punjab and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Mr. Nagar Singh, Advocate and Mr. Deepinder Brar, Advocate --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed itution of India, petitioners are seekin al respondents to protect their life ndent Nos.4 to 12. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 On the asking of the Court, Mr. Adhi ts notice on behalf of the official respo As per the petitioners, they have ma s of respondent Nos. 4 to 12, wh ers/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed th their Aadhar Cards indicating that da Bala is 8.11.2001 and petitioner No.2 -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.5981 of 2026 Date of decision: 21.5.2026 Date of uploading : 21.5.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL ate and ocate for the petitioners filed under Article 226 of the seeking issuance of directions to the r life and liberty at the hands of s No.1 to 3. r. Adhiraj Singh Thind, AAG Punjab l respondents. ve married on 27.3.2026 against the , who happen to be the family med themselves to be major relying that date of birth of petitioner No.1- r No.2-Jaspinder Singh is 2.2.1996.
2026 2026 2026 the o the s of njab t the mily lying - ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.21 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.5981
6. Witho also the me to direct res representatio submitted b two weeks f 7. Keepi married aga respondent N the petitione concerned f endeavour t 8. Liber this order on 9. Howe other case, t taking lawfu 10. The p shall also sta 21.5.2026 Ashwanii 5981 of 2026 Without commenting on the legality he merits of contentions raised in the ect respondent No.2-Commissioner of entation dated 19.5.2026 (Annexur itted by the petitioners & pass approp eeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both ed against the wishes of their family ndent No.2- Commissioner of Police, titioners as well as the parents of both rned family members in his/her pres vour to resolve their dispute(s) and liv Liberty is reserved in favour of privat rder on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found case, then this order shall not preclude lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. P also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
gality and validity of the marriage as in the petition, I deem it appropriate of Police, Fazilka to look into the nexure P-5) stated to have been appropriate orders thereupon within both the petitioners claim to have family(s), I direct that if possible, olice, Fazilka, may call a meeting of of both the petitioners and their other er presence so that the parties may nd live amicably. private respondents to seek recall of found to have been involved in any reclude the competent authority from ners. of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
ge as riate o the been ithin have sible, ng of other may all of any from any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.05.21 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document