$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010704642025 + CRL.M.C. 6761/2025 & CRL.M.A. 28459/2025 AKBAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faheem Alam, Advocate along with Petitioner in person (Through VC) versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State with SI Neeraj Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 29.09.2026 1. The present petition has been filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Cr. P.C.’] (corresponding to section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [‘BNSS’]) seeking the following reliefs: - “Quash the E-FIR No.025382/2021 U/s.380/411-IPC, P.S. Shaheen Bagh and its proceedings pending before the court of Ms. Chhavi Bansal, MM, South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi, in the interest of justice” 2. It is stated in the petition that the E-FIR No. 025382/2021 dated 14.09.2021 registered at Police Station Shaheen Bagh for offences under Section 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [‘IPC’] came to be registered at the instance of Respondent No. 3 regarding the theft of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2026 at 14:34:04 motorcycle bearing registration No. DL-7SBG-8317 Apache [‘subject property’]. 2.1 It is stated that on 26.09.2022 the Petitioner was arrested by the police in another case FIR No. 0351/2022 for offences under Section 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act, 1959 and at the instance of the Petitioner, the subject property of the present case was recovered from the Petitioner’s premise. Eventually, chargesheet has been filed against the Petitioner and the trial Court has framed the Charge on 07.12.2022. 2.2 During the pendency of the proceedings the Petitioner and Respondent no. 3 arrived at a settlement vide compromise deed dated 09.05.2024, and hence the present quashing petition has been filed. 3. Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor [‘APP’] states that the State is opposing the present quashing petition and refers to the status report dated 11.11.2025, on record. 3.1 He submits that there are 25 FIRs, which were registered against this Petitioner. He states that the details of the 25 FIRs have been enlisted at paragraph ‘3’ of the status report dated 11.11.2025. 4. After some arguments, Mr. Faheem Alam, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 5. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any liberty reserved. 6. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/rhc/IB This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2026 at 14:34:04