[2026:RJ-JP:3029] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16668/2025 Rohit Kumar S/o Ramesh Kumar Kharadia, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Vyapariyon Ka Mohalla, Gudhagodji, Police Sta- tion Gudhagodji, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashir Gaur for Mr. J.S. Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.86/2025 registered at Police Station Gudha, District Jhunjhunu for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) & 324(3) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. Though, the case has been registered under Section 109(1) of BNS also, however, only one simple injury by blunt weapon was found on the forhead of injured-Vinod Kumar. Learned counsel argues that the accused-applicant is behind the bars since long. Learned counsel contends that no specific allegation has been levelled against the accused-applicant. Learned counsel prays that [2026:RJ-JP:3029] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16668/2025] the investigation and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. He submits that three other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that no specific injury has been attributed to the accused-applicant and considering the fact that injury found on the body of the injured has been caused by blunt weapon and simple in nature and also considering the fact that the accused- applicant is behind the bars since long as well as considering the fact that trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Rohit Kumar S/o Ramesh Kumar Kharadia shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:3029] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16668/2025] 7. It is made clear that the accused petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the concerned local police station once in every three months till conclusion of trial. 8. Concerned SHO shall enter the attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /83