Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20736 (KAR)

M/S SREE GOKULAM CHITS AND FINANCE CO (P) LTD v. SRI NAGESH K M

CRL.A/805/2023 · 2026-06-10

S Rachaiah

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28021 CRL.A No. 805 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 805 OF 2023 (A) BETWEEN: M/S SREE GOKULAM CHITS AND FINANCE CO (P) LTD, CORPORATE OFFICE AT NO.66, ARCOT ROAD, CHENNAI – 600 024. AND BRANCH OFFICE AT: PEENYA NO.2 AND 3, 1ST FLOOR, SRI LAKSHMI TOWER, NETAJI ROAD, CHIKKASANDRA, JALAHALLI CROSS, PEENYA, BENGALURU – 560 057. REP BY ITS GPA HOLDER, MR NAVEEN KUMAR, S/O SRI VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H K SINGH., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI NAGESH K M AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/A NO.60, 7TH ‘A’ CROSS, Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28021 CRL.A No. 805 of 2023 MEARAHALLY, CHIKKABANAVARA, BANGALORE – 560 057. …RESPONDENT ---- THIS CRL.A FILED U/S.378(4)OF CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY XXVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL AT BENGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.25052/2018, ORDER DATED 30.09.2019 AND TO ALLOWING THIS APPEAL BY CONVICTING THE RESPONDENT AND TO IMPOSED FINE AMOUNT, AND OUT OF THE FINE AMOUNT THE PETITIONER MAY BE AWARDED COMPENSATION U/S.357 CRPC AND TO CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED TRIAL JUDGES IN C.C.NO.31771/2014 ORDER PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND XXIV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MAYO HALL UNIT SCCH-20, AT BENGALURU DATED 13.03.2018 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28021 CRL.A No. 805 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Case called out. 2. No representation on behalf of the parties. 3. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NM/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1