APHC010233582012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 36585/2012 Between: 1. DR K V H SASTRY, BHUBANESWAR, ODISA, S/O.NARASIMHA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC:SENIOR SCIENTIST, REGIONAL CENTRE CENTRAL AVIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH(ICAR) BARAMUNDA, BHUBANESWAR - 751 003 (ODISA) ...PETITIONER AND 1. VICE CHANCELLOR S V V U CHITTOOR DIST 3 OTHERS, DR.Y.S.R.BHAVAN, TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. REP.BY ITS VICE CHANCELLOR. 2. THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT, SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY DR.Y.S.R.BHAVAN, TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SRI VENKATESWARA VETERINARY UNIVERSITY, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. DR CH SRINIVASA PRASAD, PROFESSOR OF VETERINARY PHYSIOLOGY COLLEGE OF VETERINARY SCIENCE, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or 2 direction declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in appointing the 4th respondent as Professor in the Discipline of Veterinary Physiology vide Proc.No.14543/Services.1/VPY/ 2011 dt.23-10-2012 issued by the 3rd respondent though he is not eligible and qualified as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Rules and Regulations and set aside the Proc.No.14543/Services.1/VPY/2011 dt.23-10-2012 and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Professor in the discipline of Veterinary Physiology IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 46446 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Proc. No.14543/Services.1/VPY/2011 dt.23-10- 2012 issued by the 3rd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. R CHANDRA REDDY 2. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI The Court made the following: 3 Order:- There is no representation for the petitioner today. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that the petitioner challenged the appointment of the 4th respondent as Professor in Veterinary Physiology. 3. This Court, while admitting the writ petition, has not passed any interim orders and subsequently the petitioner joined elsewhere and has now attained the age of superannuation. 4. Recording the submissions of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 05.03.2026 PNS