Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20732 (JHR)

CHHOTU CHANDRAVANSHI @ CHHOTU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6598/2026 · 2026-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21303] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6598 of 2026 ------ Chhotu Chandravanshi @ Chhotu, age 22 years, Son of Gopal Chandravanshi, Resident of Village- Bhatti Mohalla, P.O.- Daltonganj, P.S. Town, District-Palamu, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 25(1-B), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused persons were in illegal possession of two country-made pistols and 14 live cartridges. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the arms and ammunitions were recovered from the possession of the co-accused persons, who are on bail. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 07th July, 2026 in B.A. No. 6264 of 2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.04.2026 as mentioned in para-16 and has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 15 of the bail application. Though, charge-sheet has already been submitted, but none of the witnesses has been examined as yet. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau in connection with Daltonganj Town P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17 /07/2026 Amar/