1 ( 2026:HHC:35828 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1035 of 2026 Decided on: 24.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Sunil Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 24.07.2026, wherein, it has been stated that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the Deputy Director of School Education, Mandi by way of passing a detailed speaking order dated 24.07.2026. 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is closed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35828 ) 3. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to assail order dated 24.07.2026 in accordance with law. 4. The petition, so also pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 24th August, 2026 Judge (raman)