Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20731 (AP)

PUKKALLA ANNAPURNA v. BODDEPALLI PALA RAJU

CRP/1426/2023 · 2026-02-01

Ravi Cheemalapati

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010239942023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1426/2023 Between: 1. PUKKALLA ANNAPURNA, W/O LATE BHASKARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RIO SRIKAKULCIRN TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. BODDEPALLI PALA RAJU, S/O LAXMI TULASI, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.7-6-4/2, PRAKASH NAGAR COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. BODDEPALLI RAJANI KUMARI, W/O PALA RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O DOOR NO.7-6-4/2, PRAKASH NAGAR COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 3. METTA PADMAVATHI, W/O DALI NAIDU, R/O DOOR NO.3-37, S M PURAM VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. PYDI GIRIDHAR BABU, S/O LATE KRISHNA SARMA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO.39-16-36, MADHAVADHARA, VISHAKHAPATNAM CITY AND DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be urged at the time of hearing may be pleased to ALLOW the Civil Revision Petition by setting-a-side the impugned Orders Dated 31.03.2023 in I.A.No.181 of 2020 in O.S.No.6 of 2009 on the file of the Honourable Principal District Judge, Srikakulam District, at Srikakulam and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings in O.S.No.6 of 2009 on the file of the Honourable Principal District Judge, Srikakulam District, at Srikakulam pending disposal of the main Civil Revision Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: Sri Vinod Kumar Tarlada, learned counsel for the petitioner, reported that suit itself has been disposed of and that the present civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. Registry has also placed on record the case information status, which indicates that on 17.06.2025 the suit was disposed of. 3. In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 02.02.2026 ANS 250 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1426/2023 Date: 02.02.2026 ANS