RAVI KHEDA @ RAVINDRA SINGH @ RAVI SINGH KHEDA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6696/2026 · 2026-07-18
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20727 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20727 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:21268] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6696 of 2026
------ Ravi Kheda @ Ravindra Singh @ Ravi Singh Kheda, aged about 35 years, son of Dalbir Singh, resident of H.N. No. 238/2, Line No. 13, Tuiladungri, P.O. & P.S. – Golmuri, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-18-07-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1), 127(2), 109, 308(4), 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant namely Lochan Kumar. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that no injury has been sustained by anybody though it is alleged that firing from firearm was made. It is also submitted that the allegation of firing from fire arms is against the co-accused namely Dhiren Tantu @ Mochi @ Dada. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 02.06.2026 as mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for
bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.07.2026 Saroj/