CHITIPIREDDY EASHWARAIAH v. SRI SHASIBHUSHAN KUMAR IAS
CC/2684/2024 · 2026-01-01
R Raghunandan Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20724 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20724 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010236652024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2684/2024 Between:
1. CHITIPIREDDY EASHWARAIAH, S/O CHENGAIAH AGED 56 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O D.NO.4-91, KONETI RAJU KANDRIKA VILLAGE RAIWAY KODURU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI SHASIBHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI V SAI RAM PRASAD, CHIEF ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION, VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT.
3. SRI D VENKATARAMAIAH, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WRD,IRRIGATION DIVISION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (ERLIERYSR KADAPA DISTRICT)
4. P CHANGAL RAYUDU, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SUB-DIVISION,KODURU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.
(ERLIERYSR KADAPA DISTRICT)
5. SRI M ABHISHIKTH KISHORE I A S, THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT,RAYACHOTI.
6. SRI S S RAWAT I A S, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRINCIPAL FINANCE SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT
2
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violation of the orders and for not implementing the orders of this Honble Court passed in WP.No.2377 of 2023 dated 25.04.2023 and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PRATHIWADA VARUN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. J DILEEP KUMAR
2.
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
No appearance for the petitioner.
2. The respondents 3 and 4 are physically present before this Court. Bailable warrants issued for their production, on 19.12.2025 are withdrawn. Their presence is dispensed with.
3. Sri J.Dharani Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 and 4 would submit that the bills of the petitioner had been cleared on 31.03.2025 itself.
4. In that view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date: 02.01.2026 KA
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2684/2024 Date: 02.01.2026 KA