2026:HHC:35895-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.2882 of 2019 Decided on: 24.08.2026 Shri Raj Kumar & another … Petitioners Versus Union of India and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners: M/s Rahul Mahajan and Arhant Mahajan, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr.Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that despite best endeavors, no instructions are coming-forth from the petitioners. 2. In that backdrop, these proceedings are closed, but as prayed for by learned Counsel for the petitioners, in case the petitioners contacts learned Counsel, they may file an application for revival thereof. 3. The petition stands disposed of, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 24, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?