IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39829 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2026 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Murlidhar Pandey Son of Late Ambika Pandey Resident of Village- Parasi, P.S.- Noorsarai and District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a senior citizen aged about 67 years and the informant alleges that petitioner along with Chhotaku and Manish came to his house on 23.02.2026 at 05.30 p.m. and started abusing, petitioner assaulted the informant by khanti causing injury on head, Chhotaku and Manish assaulted by lathi causing fracture of right hand and accused also assaulted his wife by lathi and danda. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39829 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/3 to land, it is next submitted that from side of the petitioner Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 117/2026 has been instituted against the informant and his son. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a senior citizen and is a person with clean antecedent all throughout and came to be implicated in the instant case by the informant with an allegation that he assaulted the informant by khanti causing injury on head but then the order impugned does not record about nature of injury which amply demonstrate that either no injury was caused to the informant or the injury suffered by the informant was simple. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and petitioner is not a criminal. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39829 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 3/3 is pending/successor court in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 115 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. vikram/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T