APHC010232592013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 26400/2013 Between: 1. T.THULASI RAM, S/O MUNIRATHNAM, AGED ABOUT 35 YRS, OCC: WORKING AS BARBER, RESIDENT SRIKALAHASTHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS TILAK ROAD HYDERABAD, - 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI KALAHASTHEESWARA SWAMY DEVASTHNAM, SRIKALAHASTHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (EDTS)DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more particularly on in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS, (i). to declare the action of the second respondent in not extending the benefit of Circular No. A1/4824/2013 dated 05.02.2013 issued by the 1st respondent, to the petitioner, as illegal and (ii). declare that the petitioner is entitled for the remunerated rates of Rs. 350/- per day as fixed by the 1st respondent vide Circular No. A1/4824/2013 dated 05.02.2013, and pass. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 32665 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to extend the benefit of uniform remuneration to the petitioner in terms of Circular No. A1/4824/2013 dated 05.02.2013 issued by the 1st respondent as done in the case of others, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave for filing of this Counter Affdavit dated 29.12.2024 in WP No. 26400 of 2013 in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 01.04.2026 SR