Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20716 (KAR)

MALLARAM CHAGAN LAL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5267/2026 · 2026-06-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27662 CRL.P No. 5267 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5267 OF 2026 BETWEEN: MALLARAM CHAGAN LAL S/O. MALLARAM D., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PROPRIETOR, M/S. BALAJI ENTERPRISES, GROUND FLOOR, 2/3, 13TH CROSS ROAD, KOTTIGEPALYA, NAGARBHAVI, BENGALURU URBAN, KARNATAKA - 560 072. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVAKUMAR N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA KAMAKSHIPALYA POLICE STATION, VIJAYANAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU CITY REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DR. AMBEDKAR STREET, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. NEMICHAND PRAJAPAT S/O JAVAN RAM PRAJAPATH , AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27662 CRL.P No. 5267 of 2026 SHREE KRISHNA COMPLEX, NO. 9/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SUDAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. 3. CHANCHAL KUMAR S/O. MISHRI LAL, PROPRIETOR, M/S. BALAJI AND CO., SHREE KRISHNA COMPLEX, NO. 9/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SUDAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C (U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR REGSITERED IN CR.NO.390/2025 BY KAMAKSHI PALYA P.S., VIJAYANAGAR SUB-DIVISION AGAINST THE PETITIONER, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 318 OF BNSS, U/S 51(A), 51(B), 63 OF COPY RIGHT ACT, 1957, PENDING BEFORE THE IX ACJM, AT BENGALURU, A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT AND FIR IS HEREBY PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE B AND C RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27662 CRL.P No. 5267 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the petition, the Police after investigation have filed the final report-charge sheet. 2. In the light of filing of the charge sheet, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and raise a challenge to the charge sheet. 3. Liberty so sought is granted. 4. The petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32