APHC010231982018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10242/2018 Between: 1. CHENNA PRAKASH RAO,, S/O. PEERAYYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.15-1-117/9, FLAT NO.2, SINDHU VILLA APARTMENT, TAJ HOTEL, BEACH ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY REVENUE DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GAJUWAKA, MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 JS,J W.P.No.10242 of 2018 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents, especially the 4th respondent, who is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.5.00 in Survey No.57 part of Talarivanipalem village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, assigned to the petitioner vide Patta No.DR 104/91 dated 28.12.1981, and without issuing any notice and conducting enquiry as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory and also in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the respondents to follow the procedure contemplated under law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring an extent of Ac.5.00 in Survey No.57 part of Talarivanipalem village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, assigned to the petitioner vide Patta No.DR 104/91 dated 28.12.1981, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) This Court made the following: 3 JS,J W.P.No.10242 of 2018 ORDER: Mr. G.L. Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the issue was settled in the earlier round of litigation and, therefore, no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 19th February, 2026 cbs 4 JS,J W.P.No.10242 of 2018 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.10242 of 2018 19th February, 2026 cbs