Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20713 (PNJ)

BALJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. PRIYANK BHARTI AND ANOTHER

COCP/901/2026 · 2026-05-21

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[110] Baljinder S Priyank Bh Forest, Pun Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] been accor petitioners educationa of 04 week [2] learned Sta [3] appropriate the need ar [4] disposed o 21.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-901 Date of De nder Singh and others nk Bharti, IAS, Secretary, Department st, Punjab, Chandigarh and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Vishesh Bhatia, Advocate and Mr. Viranjeet Singh Maha Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Ishar, A **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State Counsel sub accorded by the competent authori ioners along with minimum regula ational qualification. The order sha 4 weeks. In the light of undertaking gi ed State Counsel, the contempt peti Liberty is however granted opriate application seeking revival o eed arises. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 901-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 21.05.2026 …Petitioners versus rtment of ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN vocate, Ms. Jayantika Dhull, Advocate Mahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Ishar, Addl. AG, Punjab. el submits that the concurrence ha authority to regularize services of th regular pay scale after relaxing th der shall be complied within a perio ing given by the respondents throug pt petition is disposed off. ranted to the petitioners to move a vival of the contempt petition, in cas neous application(s), if any, stand (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No vocate ners. nce has s of the ing the a period through ove an , in case , stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.22 14:28 I agree to specified portions of this document