Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20712 (RAJ)

RAJ KUMAR MEENA S/O LATE SH. SURAJ KIRAN MEENA v. THE DIRECTOR, BANK OF BARODA

WRES/48/2026 · 2026-02-11

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 48/2026 Raj Kumar Meena S/o Late Sh. Suraj Kiran Meena ----Petitioner Versus The Director, Bank Of Baroda ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 11/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 15.07.2025, peremptory order was passed in writ petition to remove the defect(s) pointed out by the Registry, however, due to bona fide oversight, the necessary compliance could not be made and due to non-compliance, consequential order dated 20.09.2025 has been passed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is keen to pursue his writ petition on merits and learned counsel also undertakes to remove the defect(s) within a period of 7 days. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. 4. S.B. Civil Writ Petition no. 7479/2025 is restored to its original number subject to removal of defect(s) within 7 days. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /71