Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:21235
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 238 of 2026
-------
Falguni Rai, aged about 60 years, son of Late Chako Rai, resident of Village Bansdih, P.O. Naya Sankho, P.S. Deoli, District Giridih, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s).
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi.
3. Smt. Nancy Sahay, wife of not known to the petitioner, Director, Urban Administrative Directorate, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.
4. Mr. Prashant Kumar Layak, son of not known to the petitioner, Municipal Commissioner, Giridih Municipal Corporation, P.O. and P.S. Giridih, District Giridih, Jharkhand.
… Opp. Parties.
-------
CORAM :
SRI ANANDA SEN, J.
------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Mukul Kumar Singh, AC to GP-III
Mr. Shabad Bin Haque, Advocate
------ 02/ 18.07.2026: After going through the order, I find that since no recovery has been made from the petitioner, no contempt is made out.
2. So far as the date of payment of retiral benefit is concerned, that was merely by way of passing reference, which is consequential in nature, which has been passed in favour of the petitioner i.e. in respect of non-recovery of the amount.
3. Considering the same, this Contempt Application is dropped.
(ANANDA SEN, J.) 18th July, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded on:20/07/2026