APHC010229322016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8406/2016 Between: 1. B. SRINIVAS RAO,, SON OF PURUSHOTHAM, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC: SUB-STAFF, SR NO.09779, RESIDENT OF CHENNAI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, 265, AVAI, SHANMUKHAN SALAI, ROYAPET, CHENNAIA- 600014. 2. INDIAN BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER, DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, ZONAL OFFICE, 6-9-20/A, SECRETARIAT ROAD, SAIFABAD, P.B.NO. 91, HYDERABAD. 3. THE CIRCLE HEAD/ DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES VIGILANCE, DEPARTMENT, INDIAN BANK, CIRCLE OFFICE, CHITTOOR, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the respondents and issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction; more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order passed by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings No.CTR/VIG: 189:2004-05, dated 06-11-2004 dismissing the Petitioner from service on the basis of conviction of Criminal Court from the date of conviction 19-07-2004 with retrospective effect and also not considering the subsequent acquittal of the Petitioner in Criminal Appeal No MRK,J W.P No.8406 of 2016 2 174 of 2004, dated 18-11-2013 is illegal, unjust, contrary to law, contrary to Memorandum of Settlement arrived between union and the respondent management, and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to settle the retirement and pensionery benefits of the Petitioner by holding that the petitioner is in service from the date of dismissal to till the date of retirement i.e., 19-07-2004 to 31- 12-2008 in the interest of justice and fair play, in the interest of justice and fair play IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 10654 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay all the retirement and pensionery benefits to the petitioner, pending disposal of Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A K JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SREEDHAR VALIVETI The Court made the following Order: MRK,J W.P No.8406 of 2016 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8406/2016 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “…issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction; more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the order passed by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings No.CTR/VIG: 189:2004-05, dated 06- 11-2004 dismissing the Petitioner from service on the basis of conviction of Criminal Court from the date of conviction 19-07-2004 with retrospective effect and also not considering the subsequent acquittal of the Petitioner in Criminal Appeal No 174 of 2004, dated 18-11-2013 is illegal, unjust, contrary to law, contrary to Memorandum of Settlement arrived between union and the respondent management, and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to settle the retirement and pensionery benefits of the Petitioner by holding that the petitioner is in service from the date of dismissal to till the date of retirement i.e., 19-07-2004 to 31-12-2008 and pass such other order or orders…” 2. On 06.02.2026, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. List next week under the caption „for dismissal‟. 3. Today also, there is no representation despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, which itself shows that the petitioner is not evincing interest in prosecuting his case. 4. Apparently, the writ petition is instituted in the year 2016. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date:13.02.2026 Ksj MRK,J W.P No.8406 of 2016 4 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Writ Petition No:8406 of 2016 13th February, 2026 Ksj MRK,J W.P No.8406 of 2016 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI Writ Petition No:8406 of 2016 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 06. 13.02.2026 MRK,J This Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Vide Separate Order) _______ MRK,J Ksj