- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27753 WP No. 16757 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 16757 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: PRAKASHA C., S/O. LATE CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: SECURITY, R/AT NAGASAMUDRA ROAD, GAYATHRI BADAVANE, CHANNARAYAPATNA, HASSAN DISTRICT-573116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CANARA BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, BEHIND SUVERNA RESORTS, BM ROAD, HASSAN-573201. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, BIDARE BRANCH, NO.386, HOSPITAL ROAD, KEMBALLU POST, CHANNARAYANAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573111. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27753 WP No. 16757 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Hanumanthappa Haravi, counsel for the petitioner appeared in person. 2. Though the matter is listed today for preliminary hearing it is heard. 3. This petition is filed seeking following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing of notice dtd. 02.06.2026 issued by bearing respondent the 1st No. ROHSN/REC/CJM/PRAK vide Annexure-E. (ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents No. 1 and 2 not to make any hectic efforts dispossessing the petitioner form the schedule house property. (iii) Issue a writ or order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under circumstance of the case, in the interest of the justice and equity. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27753 WP No. 16757 of 2026 4. Counsel for the petitioner urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the papers with care. 5. The petitioner's grievance is about the issuance of the possession notice. The relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted under writ jurisdiction. The Apex Court has settled the law in a catena of decisions that a possession notice cannot be challenged by filing a writ petition. The petition is devoid of merits. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. The petitioner may approach the appropriate forum if so advised, if the law permits, in accordance with the law. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17