Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20695 (JHR)

CHAMRU MAHTO v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS

WPC/3484/2008 · 2026-07-17

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21139 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3484 of 2008 Chamru Mahto. Son of Late- Hiraman Mahto, resident of Village- Baghmara, P.S. Deodar, Sub-Division and District- Godda. …....... Petitioner (s) Vrs. 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka 3.The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 4.The Sub-Divisional Officer, Godda 5.The Circle Officer, Poraiyahat, P.S. Poraiyahat, Sub-Division and District- Godda 6.Bhim Mandal, son of Late Ram Charan Mandal, resident of Village- Baghmara, P.O. & P.S. Deodar, Sub-Division and District- Godda 7.16 Annas Raiyat of Mouza Baghmara P.O. & P.S. Deodar, Sub-Division and District-Godda ........ Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : None For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate 27/17.07.2026 Despite valid service of notice upon the petitioner and a lapse of one year, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the present writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 17.07.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026