APHC010237862019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 10603/2019 Between: 1. CHALLA JAYA SANKHAR REDDY,, S/O CHALLA YELLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51YEARS, R/O PLAT NO GL, ORANGE HOME APARTMENT, OPPOSITE PULLAIAH ENGINEERING COLLEGE, VENKAYAPALLE, NADIKOTUKUR ROAD, KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMAVARATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IV TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. CHADULA MOHAN, S/O CHEDULA NARAHARI, AGED ABOUT 34YEARS, R/O H.NO 4-163/1, SRI NAGAR COLONY,. BEDAMCHARLA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. KONKALA SANJEEV KONDA, S/O PONKALA CHINNA SANJEEVA RAYUDU, R/O 2-48 NANDIVARGAM, BANGANEPALLE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. SIVA KUMAR REDDY, S/O SHIVA SHANKARA REDDY, RIO UYYALAVADA VILLAGE ,KOVALAKUNTLA TALUKA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the IV town police 2 station and pressurizing the petitioner to repay the amounts to the 4 to 6 respondents and asking the petitioner to sit hours together with ulterior reasons as illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.10603 of 2019 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the 3rd respondent in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the IV Town Police Station and pressurising the petitioner to repay amounts to respondents Nos. 4 to 6, and in asking the petitioner to sit for hours together in the police station. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos. 1 to 3, submitted on oral instructions that no case was registered against the writ petitioner and that the petitioner was never called to the police station as alleged in the writ petition. He further submitted that, if any case is registered, the police will follow due process of law, and that no further orders are required for adjudication of the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submitted that, in view of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made by both learned counsel, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 29th January, 2026 cbn 5 101 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 10603 OF 2019 29th January, 2026 cbn