Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20694 (KAR)

SRI T KRISHNAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/16488/2026 · 2026-06-08

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27122 WP No. 16488 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 16488 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI T KRISHNAPPA S/O THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT SALUHUNASE VILLAGE H KAGGALIPURA GRAMA PANCHAYATH UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560082. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PARAMESWARAIAH D. C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPT. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU-560009. 3. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVANA BENGALURU-560009. 4. SRI.S.MUNIBYRAPPA S/O R.SHAMANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO.316, SBM ROAD SARAKKIGRAMA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27122 WP No. 16488 of 2026 BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU-560082. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS, IN PARTICULARLY RESPONDENT NO.3 TAHASILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.04.2026 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-H, THEREBY IMPLEMENT THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION DATED 30.07.2001 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN NO.KSC.ST.(S) 9/2000-01 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. The learned HCGP is directed to accept notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is to consider the representation of the petitioner at Annexure-H dated 30.04.2026 in terms of the order dated 30.07.2001 passed by the respondent No.2 (Annexure-F) to the petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27122 WP No. 16488 of 2026 3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in terms of the order dated 30.07.2001 passed by the respondent No.2 (Annexure-F), within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 39