LAKHVINDRA SINGH URF LAKKI S/O TARSEM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16655/2025 · 2026-01-31
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20693 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20693 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4601] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1155/2026 Mintu Singh S/o Kashmir Singh, R/o Gadegaal, P.S. Talera, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16655/2025 Lakhvindra Singh Urf Lakki S/o Tarsem Singh, R/o Gurudware Ke Pichhe, Gadegal, Police Station Talera District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Lal Choudhary in CRLMB No.1155/2026 Mr. Liyakat Ali in CRLMB No.16655/2025 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2026
1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.442/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for the offences under Sections 127(7), 140(2), 308(7), 310(2), 115(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard.
[2026:RJ-JP:4601] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1155/2026]
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers.
4. The allegation against the accused-petitioners is of kidnapping for ransom and wrongful confinement of the complainant. It has also been alleged that the accused have extorted Rs.35,000/- and one golden kada. The accused- petitioners are in custody since 02.12.2025 and Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge- sheet in the matter.
5. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 02.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /162-163