SRI AMAR KUMAR NATH v. ASSISTANT ENGINEER,BAGUIATI GROUP E.S.
WPA/11006/1996 · 2026-05-19
Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20693 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20693 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L.58. May 19, 2026. KAUSHIK.
WPA No. 11006 of 1996
Sri Amar Kumar Nath Vs. Assistant Engineer, Baguiati Group E.S.
None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the parties had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. There is also no adjournment prayed for on their behalf. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable. It also appears from the Report that the proceeding is not traceable even in the CIS as well as the available Rule Register and Movement Registers under the custody of the Mandamus Section. In view of the above, WPA 11006 of 1996 stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. The department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)