JAGRAM MEENA S/O SHRI MOTI LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
WMAP/21/2026 · 2026-01-20
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20689 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20689 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:2431] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 21/2026 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7172/2025 Jagram Meena S/o Shri Moti Lal Meena, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of 140, Pipalwada, Post Khijuri, District Sawai Madhopur ----Applicant/Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Deputy Secretary, Medical Education (Group-I), Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Iliyas Khan for Mr. Tanveer Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order 20/01/2026 This writ miscellaneous application is filed seeking clarification in the order dated 16.09.2025.
Learned counsel for the applicant contended that since, the Tribunal is not appreciating the directions in their true perspective, it may be clarified that it is not precluded from deciding the matter on its merit. He, therefore, prays that a clarification be issued that the Tribunal is not precluded from deciding the matter on its merit. Heard. Considered.
[2026:RJ-JP:2431] (2 of 2) [WMAP-21/2026] The order dated 16.09.2025 was passed in terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties, I do not find any occasion to issue any clarification in the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 16.09.2025 as the same do not suffer from any uncertainty or ambiguity. Resultantly, the application is dismissed.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/9