( 2026:JHHC:21265 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6660 of 2026 ------ Amit Kumar Rabidas @ Amit Ravidas, aged about 26 years, son of Chhottu Rabidas, Resident of Village-Lalmati, P.O.-Taljhari, P.S.- Rajmahal, District-Sahibganj. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 18-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No.89 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 311 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused persons, committed dacoity and looted the bag of the informant in which gold jewelleries, cash of Rs.80,000/-, bank card and documents were kept by the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR but has not yet been put on T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-09 of the bail application. It is also submitted that a compromise has been effected to between the petitioner and the victim and in this context, the learned counsel for the petitioner draws attention of this court to annexure-2 at page no.18 of the brief, which is the copy of the certified copy of the joint compromise petition filed by the parties in the Court of SDJM, Rajmahal. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.05.2026 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 25.06.2026 in B.A. No.5779 of 2026. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No.89 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 18/07/2026 Abhiraj/