Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20688 (JHR)

KULDEEP RAWANI @ KULDEEP KUMAR RAWANI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6592/2026 · 2026-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21306] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6592 of 2026 ------ 1. Kuldeep Rawani @ Kudeep Kumar Rawani, aged about 27 years, S/O- Bhagalu Rawani, Resident of Village-Phuljharia, Dugda P.O. + P.S.- Phuljharia Dugda, District- Bokaro. 2. Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, S/o- Prem Yadav Resident of Village-Phuljharia, Dugda P.O. + P.S. – Phuljharia Dugda, District- Bokaro. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Ms. Shipra Sonam, Advocate. Mr. Bhaskar Trivedi, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Dugda P.S. Case No. 34 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27/35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations against the petitioners are that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person attempted to murder Ravi Baks Ray. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are false. It is next submitted that the main allegation of firing is against co-accused – Prem Singh and Abhinandan Pandey. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 14 and they have been in custody since 03.06.2026 as mentioned in para-17 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Dugda P.S. Case No. 34 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 17/07/2026 Amar/