NARESH KUMAR SODHI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/54766/2023 · 2026-05-21
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20687 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20687 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 142 NARESH KUMAR SODHI STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Gazi Mohd. Umair, for respondent No.2.
***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for respondent copy of the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram, and submitted that since the petitioner has already been convicted by the learned JMIC, Gurugram, the present petition has become infructuous
2.
In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 21.05.2026 Gurpreet
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM Date of decision:
NARESH KUMAR SODHI Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL None for the petitioner. Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Gazi Mohd. Umair, Advocate for respondent No.2.
***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for respondent copy of the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram, and submitted that since the petitioner has already been convicted by the learned JMIC, Gurugram, the present petition has become infructuous In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-54766-2023 Date of decision: 21.05.2026 ….Petitioner
....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Gagandeep Singh Chhina, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Advocate
Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 has placed on record a copy of the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram, and submitted that since the petitioner has already been convicted by the learned JMIC, Gurugram, the present petition has become infructuous. In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL)
JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
Petitioner s
No. 2 has placed on record a copy of the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gurugram, and submitted that since the petitioner has already been convicted
In view of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.05.22 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.