Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20685 (JHR)

RAMESHWAR SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/202/2026 · 2026-07-18

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 200 of 2026 ------- Rajendra Ohdar (Retired Employee), son of Late Mohan Lal Ohdar, resident of Village-Gumla, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Gumla, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Chandramauli Singh, the Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand State, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi 3. Shri Prashant Kumar, the Secretary Finance Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. Smt. Prerna Dixit, the Deputy Commissioner, Gumla 5. Shri Pradeep Kumar Toppo, the District Accounts Officer, Gumla 6. Shri Dilip Kumar Toppo, the Treasury Officer, Gumla . … Opp. Party(s). With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 202 of 2026 ------- Rameshwar Sahu (Retired Employee), son of Late Jitu Sahu, resident of Village-Gumla, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Gumla, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Chandramauli Singh, the Accountant General (A&E), Jharkhand State, P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi 3. Shri Prashant Kumar, the Secretary Finance Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. Smt. Prerna Dixit, the Deputy Commissioner, Gumla 5. Shri Pradeep Kumar Toppo, the District Accounts Officer, Gumla 6. Shri Dilip Kumar Toppo, the Treasury Officer, Gumla . … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ranjan Pd. Ram, Advocate For the State: M/s. Zeeshan Ahmad Khan, AC to SC-VII For the Acct. General: Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, Advocate. ------ 04/18.07.2026 It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order dated 21.10.2024 passed in WP(S) No. 5490 of 2023 has been complied with by passing a reasoned order. Considering the aforesaid submission, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, both these contempts are dropped. Pending interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file an appropriate application challenging the order passed by the opposite parties. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 18th July, 2026 Anu/SKC-CP-02 Uploaded on 20.07.2026