$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010000502026 + RC.REV. 3/2026 & CM APPL. 314/2026 (Stay) DAVINDER KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Sehgal and Mr. Piyush Dhawal Mishra, Advocates. versus SURINDER KUMAR CHADHA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Counsel (Appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 29.09.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeking the following reliefs: “a) To call for the records of Eviction Petition bearing ARC No. 95/2018 titled as Sh. Surinder Chadha & Anr. Vs. Smt. Sita Rani & Ors. decided by the Court of Ld. ARC, West Delhi vide order and judgment dated 07.08.2025. b) To set aside impugned order and judgment dated 07.08.2025 passed in Eviction Petition bearing ARC No. 95/2018 titled as Sh. Surinder Chadha & Anr. Vs. Smt. Sita Rani & Ors. by the Court of Ld. ARC, West Delhi and allow the Revision Petition filed by the petitioners and dismiss the Eviction Petition or in the alternative grant the petitioner the leave to defend, in the interest of justice, c) Pass any such order and further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are ad idem that an Affidavit of Undertaking has already been filed by the Petitioners in terms of the Order dated 17.04.2026 and in terms of which the Petitioners have undertaken to vacate the premises on This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 10:54:47 17.01.2027. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are also ad idem that the occupation charges had not been determined at the time when the Order for filing of the Affidavit of Undertaking came to be passed and in view thereof, the learned counsel for the parties, on instructions, submit that it has been agreed as between the parties, that instead of paying monthly user and occupations charges, a lump sum amount of Rs. 75,000/- will be paid by the Petitioners to the Respondents on or before 15.10.2026. 4. It is also agreed that the said amount of Rs. 75,000/- shall be paid separately and in addition to the amount of Rs. 49,800/- which amount has already been deposited in the accounts of the Respondents by the Petitioners. 5. This Court takes note of the terms of settlement entered into between the parties and directs that the parties shall abide by their respective undertakings both in the Affidavit of Undertaking as also the submissions made in Court and as recorded hereinabove. 6. Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in the present Petition and the present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the above terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/tk/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 10:54:47