Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20680 (BOM)

Ms PUNEET DEVELOPERS v. NEHRU NAGAR MITRA SAHAKARI CHSL

CARBP/1080/2026 · 2026-10-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10-CARBP-1080-2026 (OS) .DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 1080 OF 2026 Ms Puneet Developers ...Petitioner Versus Nehru Nagar Mitra Sahakari CHSL ...Respondent __ Mr. Indrakumar Lahoti i/b. Praxis Legal for the Petitioner Ms. Sunitha Perumal i/b. Sachin Masurkar for the Respondent __ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 16th OCTOBER 2026 P.C. 1. This is the Petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and seeks an extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal to complete the arbitration proceedings and pass an arbitral award. This is a first extension. 2. I am informed that the arbitration proceedings are at the stage of cross-examination. Learned counsel for the Respondent confirms this position and does not oppose for extension. 3. In my view, the substantive interest of justice would best be served if the time is extended. Basavraj Page|1 BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Date: 2026.10.17 12:14:44 +0530 10-CARBP-1080-2026 (OS) .DOC 4. Accordingly, the Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 5. It is made clear that the extended time shall commence from the date on which a copy of this order is uploaded. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Basavraj Page|2