Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2068 (ORI)

MAMATA BALIARSINGH v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMP/403/2026 · 2026-04-07

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 403 of 2026 Mamata Baliarsingh ….. Petitioner Mr. Jyotirmaya Sahoo, Advocate -versus- 1. State of odisha 2. Addl. Director General of Police, CID(CB), Odisha 3. Commissioner of Police, Cuttack 4. Superintendent of Police, CID(CB), Odisha 5. Asst. Commissioner of Police, Cyber Police Station, Cuttack ….. Opposite Parties Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 07.04.2026 Order No. 01. (Through hybrid Mode) 1. This CRLMP has been filed for a direction to the Opposite Party No. 3 and 4 to complete the investigation in Cyber Crime and Economics Offence P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 and take steps to arrest the accused persons. 2. Mr. S. J. Mohanty, learned Additional Standing Counsel produces the instruction dated 03.04.2026 of the Inspector, Cyber Crime and Economics Offence Police Station, Cuttack UPD where it is stated that PS Case No. 08 dated 16.01.2026 has been registered under Section 318(4)/319(2) of the BNS read with Section 66C and 66D of the IT Act. 3. The steps taken during the investigation has been described in the instruction and it is also stated that inquiry report has been submitted to the learned Magistrate to pass directions for refund of the amount of Rs.2,94,351/- lying in one of the accounts in favour of p. 2 the petitioner. It is also stated that the victim has transferred the money to different bank accounts, which are located in different places and the IP is registered in Cambodia. Further analysis and verification is required and investigation is in progress. 4. After perusal of the instructions, I am satisfied that investigation in the case is being conducted by the Inspector, Cyber Crime and Economics Offence Police Station, Cuttack UPD, who is the IO in the case. Hence, no direction is necessary to be issued to the IO/Opposite Party No. 3 and 4 at this stage. 5. The CRLMP is disposed of directing the IO in the case to make efforts to complete the investigation expeditiously and make all efforts for recovery of the amounts which has been transferred by the petitioner to different accounts. (Savitri Ratho) Judge Subhalaxmi SAHOO