Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20679 (BOM)

PANDHARI BHAGWAT PANCHBUDDHE @ BANDU v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/2888/2026 · 2026-10-15

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

33-IA-2888-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2888 OF 2026 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1230 OF 2021 Pandhari Bhagwat Panchbuddhe Alias Bandu ..Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent WITH APPEAL NO. 235 OF 2021 WITH APPEAL NO. 350 OF 2021 Mr. Subhash Surve, for Applicant/Appellant. Mr. D. J. Haldankar, APP, for Respondent No.1. Mr. Kuldeep Patil, with Sumitkumar Nimbalkar and Anay Joshi, for Respondent No.2-CBI. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 15th OCTOBER 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. This is an Application to relax the condition of attendance at the trial Court imposed by this Court while while suspending the sentence imposed on the Applicant, during the pendency of the Appeal No. 350 ARS 1/2 ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Digitally signed by ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2026.10.17 12:39:52 +0530 33-IA-2888-2026.DOC of 2021. The Applicant was directed to report the trial Court once in three months till the Appeal is finally disposed. 3. Mr. Subhash Surve, the learned Counsel for the Applicant, submitted that the Applicant is resident of District Bhandara. The Applicant finds it onerous to attend the trial Court every quarter. 4. Having regard to the situation in life of the Applicant, the condition to mark presence before the trial Court every quarter appears to operate onerously. 5. Thus, the condition of attendance stands modified to the effect that the Applicant shall henceforth mark his presence on the first Monday of January every year till the final disposal of this Appeal at SP/CBI/ACB/Mumbai, Plot No. 35-A, G Block, Kurla (BKC), Bandra (East), Mumbai 400 098. 6. Application disposed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] ARS 2/2