Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20679 (AP)

Ravula Padmavathi @ Padmaja v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/3573/2022 · 2026-02-08

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010237832022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3573/2022 Between: 1.RAVULA PADMAVATHI @ PADMAJA, W/O. RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGE 51 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O DOOR NO 35-3- 69,(55/8), C.R.P QUARTERS, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.BONU DURGA , @ GONU DURGA, D/O. THAVITI NAIDU, AGE 32 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DOOR NO 19-28-454, CLOUG PETA 5TH LINE, RAILWAY STATION ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.KESANA SESHAMMA,, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGE 61 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O DOOR NO 37-1-407-28A, BEHIND RAMAKRISHNA WALKING CENTRE, BHAGYA NAGAR 2ND LINE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.RAYAPATI SEETHAMMA @ SITA, W/O. VENKATESWARLU (LATE), AGE 53 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O DOOR NO 3-58, OLD B.C. HOSTEL ROAD, KONDEPI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.ARLA VENKATARATHNAM @ALLA VENKATARATHNAM,, W/O. AD HI NARAYANA, AGE 61 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O DOOR NO 37- 1-226, OLD MARKET CENTRE, NEAR ISMAIL HOTEL, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 2.KUMMURI SUDHAKAR MADIGA, S/O. PEDA SESHAIAH, AGE 48 YEARS, CHAIRMAN OF AGRICULTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, SANTHANUTHALAPADU CONSTITUENCY, ADDRESS EDUMUDI VILLAGE, N.G. PADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.V V LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the case against the Petitioners was ended in acquittal vide judgment in S.C.No.37/2023 on 22.09.2025. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 09.02.2026 VTS