CRWP-5986-20 IN THE H (153) KESHAV SHAR STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. **** MANISHA BAT 1. The the Constitution the official respo petitioners at the their representati 2. At t submitted that t 17.05.2026 befor P-6) raising thei same has not yet further submitted 2026 (O&M) (1) HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AN CHANDIGARH CR Dat SHARMA AND ANOTHER Versus
F HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Sahil, Advocate for the petitione Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed tution of India seeking issuance of a w l respondents No.2 and 3 to protect at the hands of respondents No.4 to sentation dated 17.05.2026 (Annexure At the very outset, learned couns that the petitioners have recently before the Senior Superintendent of P g their grievances as mentioned in th ot yet been considered and no action h mitted that at this stage, the petitioners AB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-5986-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 21.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondent MANISHA BATRA
titioners ryana n filed under Article 226/227 of of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the o.4 to 14 and to take action on exure P-6). counsel for the petitioners has ently filed a representation on nt of Police, Bhiwani (Annexure d in the present petition but the ction has been taken thereon. He tioners would be satisfied if AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.21 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5986-20 appropriate direc of Police, Bhiw petitioners and ta 3. Noti 4. Mr. behalf of the resp due course. Let a the course of the 5. In v commenting any disposed of at th aforesaid represe within a period accordance with petitioners, the o in order to protec
21.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) e directions are issued to respondent N Bhiwani to decide the aforesaid re and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. r. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryan he respondents-State and submits that . Let a complete set of the paperbook of the day. In view of the limited prayer made g anything on the merits of the cas f at this stage with a direction to resp epresentation dated 17.05.2026 (Annex eriod of 15 days from today, by pa with law. Needless to say, if an , the official respondents would provi protect their life and liberty. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Ye
  
dent No.2-Senior Superintendent aid representation filed by the aryana, has advance notice on s that the needful will be done in rbook be supplied to him during made by the petitioners, without the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners by passing a speaking order in if any threat is found to the provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No
AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.21 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.