MYSORE POLYMERS EMPLOYEES UNION UNIT v. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION
WP/13207/2026 · 2026-06-10
Jyoti M
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20672 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20672 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27981 WP No. 13207 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 13207 OF 2026 (L-PF) BETWEEN:
MYSORE POLYMERS EMPLOYEES UNION UNIT, UNIT OF MYSORE DIVISION INDUSTRIAL WORKERS GENERAL UNION, A TRADE UNION REGISTERED UNDER THE TRADE UNION ACT, AFFILIATED TO AITUC, K.V. BHAVAN, NO. 2, 2ND MAIN ROAD, KAMAKSHI HOSPITAL ROAD, NEAR SARASWATI TALKIES, SARASWATIPURAM, MYSURU - 570 009. REPRESENTED BY ITS UNIT SECRETARY. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. MAITREYI KRISHNAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION A STATUTORY BODY UNDER THE MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, UNION OF INDIA, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.109-128, GAYATHRI PURAM, 2ND STAGE, MYSURU - 570019. REPRESENTED BY REGIONAL PROVIDENT COMMISSIONER. 2. MYSORE POLYMERS AND RUBBER PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. NO.20P, K.R.S. ROAD, METAGALLI, MYSURU - 570 016. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27981 WP No. 13207 of 2026
A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.V.VIDYULATHA, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. NAVEEN KUMAR N.R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SOMASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER Smt.Maitreyi Krishnan, counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Naveen Kumar, counsel on behalf of Sri.Somashekar, for respondent No.2, appeared in person. Smt.B.V.Vidyulatha, counsel for respondent No.1, appeared through video conferencing. 2. This petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ or order, quashing the communication bearing No. KN/PF/IRO/Mys/PoHW/2025-26/02 dated 01.04.2026 passed by 1st Respondent (placed as Annexure - M) as the same is illegal, unfair and unconstitutional.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27981 WP No. 13207 of 2026
b. Order that the members of the Petitioners (as per Annexure - A) are eligible for higher pension on higher wages as on 31.10.2025, as per the provisions of EPS 95
c. A Writ of Mandamus or any other writ or order, directing the 1st Respondent to approve the Application of the members of the Petitioners (as per Annexure - A) who have opted for higher pension on higher wages and consequently provide them the higher pension on higher wages with arrears;
d. Such other writ, direction or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and expedient in the circumstances of the case, including award of costs. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several
contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the papers with utmost care.
4. The issue at hand is confined to a narrow scope, namely, the submission of joint declaration forms seeking a higher pension. On behalf of respondent No.2–Management, it is submitted that due to network difficulties, the uploading of employee data could not be completed within the stipulated time. Consequently, the Management requested respondent No.1–Organization to reopen the portal for submission of the requisite particulars. This request, however, was rejected on
01.04.2026.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27981 WP No. 13207 of 2026
In view of the technical impediment that prevented the timely uploading of the data, a direction is hereby issued to respondent No.1 to reopen the portal, enabling the submission of employee particulars. Respondent No.2–Management shall, upon receipt of a certified copy of this order, submit the employee data within two weeks. Thereafter, respondent No.1 shall consider the joint declaration forms in accordance with the law within six weeks.
5. With the above observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE
SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78